The BBC & social media

April 30th, 2005

John Naughton writing in last weeks Observer, published an article Priceless thinking at the BBC.
Essentially the BBC is going to produce a Creative Archive
The BBC describes it thus a "pioneering new approach to public access rights in digital age"
Naughton writes

The BBC – the world's greatest creator of high-quality multimedia products – has finally launched its Creative Archive. The project – first announced by former director-general Greg Dyke in August 2003, and much delayed as BBC staff grappled with the rights issues implicit in it – will allow British residents to download clips of BBC factual programmes from bbc.co.uk for non-commercial use, keep them on their PCs, manipulate and share them, thereby making the BBC archives more accessible to licence-fee payers.
The content is not available yet but the licences under which it will be provided have now been published. In the next, pilot, phase of the project the Creative Archive will make 100 hours of BBC content available.


Naughton touches the complex issues around IP and rights – but also what struck me was the BBC understanding that content – films whatever can be used and consumed in so many more interesting and personalised ways.
That connectivity and technology enables us to do and think about doing things in ways we could not in the past. Equally the concept of access is key here.
In a recent Morgan Stanley report, The age of engagement I came across a term called social media. What the BBC is doing with their creative archive is very much what I would describe as social media – offering material once locked into a singular delivery format and broadcast on one platform to wider more fluid platforms.
The BBC understand that the the value of the content can be reshaped and reused for different purposes. That by releasing their archive footage in this way they are continually releasing the value of their films and programmes in innovative ways.
The BBC understands that it has to repond to the widest community to keep itself relevant as a Public Service Broadcaster in the 21st Century.
Naughton sums up

Some years ago, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology blew the nascent educational-content business out of the water by making its courseware available for free on the web. Who would pay for content from Mickey Mouse universities when MIT's was free? By challenging the IP mania that threatens to engulf us, the Creative Archive project is doing something similar. And in the process showing us what public-service broadcasting is for.

BBC Creative archive – Social Media

April 30th, 2005

John Naughton writing in last weeks Observer (I know I know – I have been a little low profile this week – so I am just catching up after an avalanche of work), published an article Priceless thinking at the BBC

Essentially the BBC is going to produce a Creative Archive

The BBC describes it thus a “pioneering new approach to public access rights in digital age”

Naughton writes

The BBC – the world’s greatest creator of high-quality multimedia products – has finally launched its Creative Archive. The project – first announced by former director-general Greg Dyke in August 2003, and much delayed as BBC staff grappled with the rights issues implicit in it – will allow British residents to download clips of BBC factual programmes from bbc.co.uk for non-commercial use, keep them on their PCs, manipulate and share them, thereby making the BBC archives more accessible to licence-fee payers.

The content is not available yet but the licences under which it will be provided have now been published. In the next, pilot, phase of the project the Creative Archive will make 100 hours of BBC content available.

Naughton touches the complex issues around IP and rights – but also what struck me was the BBC understanding that content – films whatever can be used and consumed in so many more interesting and peronalised ways.

That connectivity and technology enables us to do and think about doing things in ways we could not in the past. Equally the concept of access is key here.

In a recent Morgan Stanley report, The age of engagement I came across a term called social media. I think what the BBC is doing with their creative archive is very much what I would describe as social media

The BBC understands that it has to repond to the widest community to keep making itself relevant as a Public Service Broadcaster in the 21st Century.

Naughton sums up

Some years ago, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology blew the nascent educational-content business out of the water by making its courseware available for free on the web. Who would pay for content from Mickey Mouse universities when MIT’s was free? By challenging the IP mania that threatens to engulf us, the Creative Archive project is doing something similar. And in the process showing us what public-service broadcasting is for.

Admen failing to engage

April 26th, 2005

Published in the media section of the Guardian yesterday

Jim Hytner’s article on how difficult it is for marketeers to reach consumers raises several interesting points (When the message doesn’t get through, April 18) but could go further. While it is undoubtedly true that the British public are being bombarded with too much marketing information, particuarly through TV, the answer is not just to project more loudly and more clearly. It is to change the relationship between company and customer.

The real problem is that all of this marketing is “interruptive” in its nature, with the marketer trying to impose their brand on the customer and coerce a sale. This is most apparent in TV advertising, which pushes out its own idea of what brand is without engaging the potential customer. No wonder that even Andrew Robertson , chief executive of of BBDO advertising, acknoledges that TV advertising is losing its potency, fast. The reason why Apple and Tesco are doing so well, as Hytner acknoledges, is that they have learn’t bbetter than most how to change this relationship. They are replacing the passive “customer base” with the active “customer community”.

Alan and Tomi

Tomi Interview by Mobile Technoloy Weblog

April 26th, 2005

In mobile technology weblog

Q. If you had to summarise the key message in your new book, Communities Dominate Brands, what would it be?

A. The digitally connected and empowered customer-community is a very recent phenomenon, that is now radically altering how businesses can function. Communities from bloggers to mobile phone smart mobs can turn against a brand or support its activities.

Putting in context of the other huge business impacts of such radical changes over the past 100 years as TV, credit cards, the internet etc., communities are the single biggest change in a hundred years. Only the advent of electricity had as big an effect.

But this change is very recent, the first signs became visible only two-three years ago, and the very first case studies can now be made in 2005, from which we can start to form general trends.

That is what this book is about. It is the first practical business book on how to capitalise on community power. Don’t become a victim of communities by accidentally arousing them against you. Don’t be left in the dustbin of history by ignoring communities. But learn now how to embrace and engage communities to your advantage. Winners in all industries over the next five years will be those who were among the first to grasp this change.

Your’re such a rock star Tomi

Communities Dominate Brands [2]

April 26th, 2005

In mobile technology weblog- Tomi Ahonen is interviewed

Q. If you had to summarise the key message in your new book, Communities Dominate Brands, what would it be?
A. The digitally connected and empowered customer-community is a very recent phenomenon, that is now radically altering how businesses can function. Communities from bloggers to mobile phone smart mobs can turn against a brand or support its activities.
Putting in context of the other huge business impacts of such radical changes over the past 100 years as TV, credit cards, the internet etc., communities are the single biggest change in a hundred years. Only the advent of electricity had as big an effect.
But this change is very recent, the first signs became visible only two-three years ago, and the very first case studies can now be made in 2005, from which we can start to form general trends.
That is what this book is about. It is the first practical business book on how to capitalise on community power. Don't become a victim of communities by accidentally arousing them against you. Don't be left in the dustbin of history by ignoring communities. But learn now how to embrace and engage communities to your advantage. Winners in all industries over the next five years will be those who were among the first to grasp this change.

Admen failing to engage

April 26th, 2005

Published in the media section of the Guardian yesterday

Jim Hytner's article on how difficult it is for marketeers to reach consumers raises several interesting points (When the message doesn't get through , April 18) but could go further. While it is undoubtedly true that the British public are being bombarded with too much marketing information, particularly through TV, the answer is not just to project more loudly and more clearly. It is to change the relationship between company and customer.
The real problem is that all of this marketing is "interruptive" in its nature, with the marketer trying to impose their brand on the customer and coerce a sale. This is most apparent in TV advertising, which pushes out its own idea of what brand is without engaging the potential customer. No wonder that even Andrew Robertson , chief executive of of BBDO advertising, acknowledges that TV advertising is losing its potency, fast. The reason why Apple and Tesco are doing so well, as Hytner acknowledges, is that they have learn't better than most how to change this relationship. They are replacing the passive "customer base" with the active "customer community".


Alan and Tomi

There is a global conversation going on out there

April 24th, 2005

We at SMLXL HQ like the web. In fact we love it. Especially for me, as I spent years travelling the world to Austria, Finland, Sweden, Norway, the United States. In fact for over 4 years I spent 150 days a year on an areoplane.

Its some relief that I don’t have to do that anymore. The world comes pretty much to me.

So last week in my inbox arrives a fantastic piece of research from Trendwatching. Don’t subscribe? I suggest you do. These guys deliver great value. This blog is about the expansion of our thinking of the book ‘Communities Dominate Brands‘. And Trendwatching delivered some valuable insights into our work.

This is what they have to say

Marketing has finally become a conversation. Not, in most cases, as was intended, BETWEEN corporations and consumers (that would make too much sense), but rather a global conversation involving millions of consumers ABOUT corporations. On sites like Planetfeedback.com , thecomplaintstation.com , Epinions , About.com , on hundreds of thousands of blogs, community sites, forums, viral emails, bulletin boards, and what have you, consumers relentlessly exchange views, complaints, opinions and comments about products and services, about brands, about companies, about YOUR company.

Why now? Because they finally can. For decades, consumers have been saving up their insights and rants about the stuff they consume, simply because there were no adequate means to interact with companies, or with other consumers for that matter. No longer. These fickle, wired, empowered, informed, opinionated and experienced holders of a MC (Master in Consumerism) are getting used to ‘having it their way’, in ANY way imaginable, which includes wanting to have a direct influence on what companies develop and produce for them.

Then if you are talking co-creation of advertising communications then have a look at Coors light , Mercedes , Mazda and Conde Nast

These companies are clearly aware that tapping into the collective intellectual capital of their customers yields great creative and ‘real’ content. However, let’s not make the mistake to think that in the end these conversations will all be about communications and branding: how about extending this cooperation with consumers to virtually everything a corporation does, by making the customer an integral part of ALL creative and creational processes?

The there is LEGO which is allowing programmers to interact with its toy robot and develop it as a community at Mindstorm or get over to the TiVo community Where

65,000 members of the self-organized TiVo Community forum have traded ideas on ‘how to convince friends and family to buy a TiVo’

On to gaming where communities modify games and are

entire new games upon themselves. They can include new items, weapons, characters, enemies, models, modes, textures, levels, and story lines. They also usually take place in unique locations

Try out Desert Combat

Trend watching suggest

So, to get started, what’s stopping you from setting up your own ipodlounge.com, hiltonlobby.com, virgincabin.com, ingcounter.com, saabbackseat.com, safewaysaisles.com or vodafoneconnection.com, and inviting your customers to engage in CUSTOMER-MADE goods, services and experiences? Are you ready to open up (even as an experiment) one strategy meeting, one design process, one brainstorming session to the millions of consumers who may have an expert opinion, suggestion, new business idea and so on, simply because they’re your avid users, and, in the best case, true fans?

As we would argue the only number you need to grow is customer advocacy.

Now the flood gates are open

These fickle, wired, empowered, informed, opinionated and experienced holders of a MC (Master of Consumerism) are getting used to ‘having it their way’, in ANY way imaginable, which includes wanting to have direct influence on what companies develop and produce for them.

You could always hang out at the Coverse gallery where the public make 24 second films about their sneakers.

we argue in the book that co-creation is very much part of the future, its more organic, more real, more contextual as trendwatching argue that this means

co-created goods, co-created services, co-created experiences! So, waking up to the fact that there are hundreds of thousands of experts, innovators, inventors and so on outside company walls, research labs and innovation units at large corporations are increasingly NOT going it alone.

Now talking car companies there is Peugeot with its concours design project and BMW with its Customer innovation Lab

Jam to together some brands and services to get a better service this is what Paul Rademacher did by marrying data from CraigsList and Google to match house prices to specific geographic areas.

But lets cultural

Tate Britain is running a programme where people can submit the titles of works of Art hung in the galleries. You win, your title goes up next to that work of art. Its called Write your own label

The website says

Would you like to see your ideas about art on the walls of Tate Britain? We’re asking visitors to write about any work of art on display at Tate Britain which especially interests them.

We’d particularly like to hear from visitors who have a special interest in the subject matter of some of Tate’s paintings. Are you interested in music, fashion, botany, theology or engineering? Have you visited, or do you live near, a place shown in one of the landscapes? Have you experienced an event shown in one of the paintings?

We have all heard of Oh My News in Korea, an online citizen newspaper, well now there is a magazine JPG with a similar format

And travel, IgoUgo

And to prove that user generated content is fast trumping any kind of traditional guide, listing, or other limited overview, look no further than IgoUgo. The online travel community’s 350,000 members offer what traditional guidebooks can’t: hundreds of thousands of opinions on more than 4,000 destinations across the globe, plus suggestions and photos for everything from cheap eats and luxury accommodations, to must-see attractions and worthwhile day trips.

So you see, this is not theory. Its happening all around you. Our book is a small toe in the ocean of evidence out there.

Thanks to Trendwatching for doing such a great job.

Mobile world’s ‘connected community’ presents advertisers with a new challenge

April 24th, 2005

The publication of our letter in the Financial times on Thursday April 21.
Tomi and I were responding to the article that had run in the FT "TV under threat". This is what we had to say

Sir,
Your editorial "TV under threat" (April 13) quite correctly pointed out that the rise of high-speed mobile networks poses a huge problem for advertisers still thinking in terms of the 30 second television spot. A media-saavy public has learn't to "tune out" TV advertising, and with the rise of TiVo and Sky+ and similar technologies will soon be able to avoid it entirely. Indeed, most advertisers are not just lagging behind the pace of change in consumer behaviour – they are still stuck at the starting line.
To see how profoundly this will change the British TV industry, it is beneficial to look to other countries that have experienced these changes. Many people know that two years ago in the US, the TV industry began to make more of its revenues from subscriptions than advertising. Fewer people know that in Finland, one of the most advanced mobile phone markets in the world, revenues from interactive mobile services (such as mobile voting, popularised by reality television) now outstrip TV advertising revenue. Both these changes will come to bear on the UK, sooner rather than later.
As television grows more independent of advertising revenues, so must advertisers learn to be more independent of TV. This means advertisers that are stuck in the past must grapple with the new challenge of the mobile world – the so-called "connected community" . This new generation is more aware, critical and knowledgeable about the way marketing works, and accustomed to switching with ease between "networks" (internet, mobile phone and so on).
All this makes the connected community an elusive group to reach, but the marketing industry must learn how to do so soon. Otherwise marketeers will more and more find themselves talking to themselves.


So you can have same old-same old. And become increasingly irrelevant.
Or you can have something that is altogether different. 

Bill Gates muses on two way flows of communication

April 20th, 2005

Bill Gates on Blogging

Tony Perkins of AlwaysOn, the blogazine of innovation writes in the hard copy (not available online) about Bill Gates' comments on blogging during a private dinner at Gates home on Lake Washington:
Blogging makes it very easy to communicate. It gets away from drawbacks of email and the drawbacks of a website. Eventually, most businesses will use blogs to communicate with customers, suppliers and employees, because it's two-way and more satisfying.
That's a simple statement, true and coming from a 'businessman' such as Bill Gates ought to appeal to the more traditional suits.
Perkins adds his own thought:

Gates knows that the referral power of the blogosphere is also exploding and marketing and PR executives must embrace this reality or risk losing control of their messages.
Lose control of their messages? Marketing and PR executives, Step. Away. From. The Message. You cannot control it anymore, the best you can do is to shape it, while respecting your audience and the medium you use to engage them.

Blogs are indeed conversations

when the world changes fundamentally

April 17th, 2005

Re-reading Bob Garfields ‘Chaos Scenario piece clearly demonstrates that more conventional marketing is no longer the answer, what is required is a different type of marketing, a new way of doing things.

Garfield writes


As technology increasingly enables fine targeting and interaction between marketer and consumer, the old measurement and deployment standards are primitive almost to the point of absurdity.

“The industry?s key currency is basically reach, frequency, exposure and cost per thousand,” says Rishad Tobaccowala, president of Internet media shop Starcom IP. “I’m not saying whether it?s right or wrong but that’s currently the currency. And where the currency ought to be is about outcomes, engagement and effectiveness. Because right now all I?m doing is I?m measuring how cheaply or how expensively I?m buying the pig. I?m not figuring out whether the hot dog tastes good.”

Are we running to standstill? Have we eroded difference by hyper-competition in all areas of business bailing out the sinking ship with ever decreasing effectiveness?

when everything starts to look alike, when you can’t differentiate, when you can get it cheaper on the net – what do you do? what do you do when your customers come armed to the teeth with information – when they expect ‘service,’ ‘quality.’ People are not hoodwinked by marketing messaging – They know that what is on offer is or is not an attainable reality. Piss them off – don’t come up to the mark – “well baby, I’m outta here”

So you have got to interact – understand everything is negotiable – don’t pay lipservice to the notion ‘we are a customer centric company’ Interactivity, two-way flows of information, ease of access to information – a life spent on google and SEARCH – fundamentally change brands hegomony.

More direct marketing sounds like “INCOMING’” to me as we dive into our shelters or sign-up to the “DO NOT CALL ME REGISTER”

If as a brand you are not provider of a valuable experience – go home – hang up your boots and retire.

In this new world the key to commercial success is to make your customers successful – understand your customers needs – involve them – engage them – develop strategies that by holding their attention willingly, you can also have a commercial relationship.

ITS NOT CRM IT’S CMR where the empahsis is on relationship NOT management. And in a new media ecology of always on – always connected – some argue vociferously that stand alone TV advertising seems increasingly circumspect

But of course at the moment TV advertising spend is still increasing – The comfy cardy of the 30 sec spot lives on. It is very cosy. And its not that TV advertising will go away – its just that the notion that we have to get everybody all in front of the box – ALL at the same time, to get the eyeballs etc. Is looking pretty prehistoric – shrinking TV audiences are coveted still – as Bob garfield writes

they are the last vestige of mass media and marketing

In fact we argue thatc the term mass media is becoming an oxymoron.

And when Andrew Robertson, the CEO of the BBDO advertising agency (the world’s third largest) says in the Financial Times , “Mobile Phones will replace TV as most important medium.”

You start to figure, that, perhaps, our familiar analogue media eco-system teeters on the brink.

As a practicioner of cross-platform engagement strategies – I see more and more and more requests for ‘big ideas’ – cross platform strategies. Terms used are of engagement, creative content strategies, which we have advised on a few

Customers you see, embrace the world holistically – funnily enough where-as we marketers like to chop chop chop, everything down into little tiny pieces – then we bandy words around like “integration.”

It just does not work like that anymore. Though some people out there seem hell bent on postponing the future as Steven Rosenbaum testify’s

IF ONE THINKS THAT AT THE POINT OF PURCHASE YOU HAVE JUST MADE THE FIRST STEP – WHERE DOES THAT TAKE YOU?

Remove the notion that marketing is ‘adversarial’ and you start to get into a really interesting place – that can be tailored and enhanced by new digital technologies – one can create and co-create value in so many ways.

Customerbase is replaced with customer community – And all brand interaction should deliver an experience that actively links customers, media and brand in relevant and meaningful ways. Brand experience replaces broadcasting in its broadest sense.

And finally from Garfield

fragmentation, the bane of network TV and mass marketers everywhere, will become the Holy Grail, the opportunity to reach — and have a conversation with — small clusters of consumers who are consuming not what is force-fed them, but exactly what they want. Producers and broadcasters capitalized with billions of dollars will be on approximately equal footing with podcasters and video bloggers capitalized with $399.99 12-months same-as-cash from Best Buy. And just as DailyKos, Instapundit, Wonkette and Wil Wheaton have coalesced large followings in the cacophony of the blogosphere, some of the citizen-video programmers will find not just a voice but an audience.

You can agree or disagree with this but I believe there is a conversation to be had. Today and tomorrow we have to start helping companies towards ‘integrated thinking’, which is very different from a format specific start point.

It is an holistic approach – idea driven – richly creative and richly rewarding – lots of fun – with great opportunities for those that get it right.

So what are you going to take? The Red Pill or the Blue Pill?

Over and out.

Follow SMLXL