What Advertisers don’t get

May 31st, 2005

What people don't seem to "get" yet is this: not only is the advertising market going elsewhere, or demanding more, but manufacturers are figuring out how to "meet" consumers without going through the media or advertising market at all. The Internet may make that possible.
Advertisers with alternatives to traditional media, yes. But also: manufacturers with alternatives to advertising. And by the way, who is going to advise them on such opportunities? The existing agencies?
Maybe the old is nearer to toppling than we think.


Via PressThink

Whilst I was playing with my new Xbox

May 31st, 2005

Ken Auletta in the New Yorker: Do ads still work?

In many ways, the advertising business in the early twenty-first century would be unrecognizable to the generation that once thrived on Madison Avenue. The traditional assumption, as Keith Reinhard says, was that advertisers chose the time and place of a 'one-way show-and-tell' ad. The consumer was a captive audience. Today, advertisers chase consumers with a certain air of desperation.


via PressThink

People today are busy co-creating their experiences, and sharing those experiences with their friends 

Troubling times for retailers

May 31st, 2005

Are we in a cycle? Are we facing something more fundamentally structural? As retailers continue to struggle.
The FT on Thursday 26 May reported that WH Smith, MFI, Dixons and Kingfisher had all suffered on the high street and their share price reflected that struggle.
Boots are another high street retailer that has faced mounting difficulties.
The Observer reported that

M&S shareholders are braced for poor trading news this week when chief executive Stuart Rose is set to confirm that sales are falling and profits for the past year are in the region of ?610 million – down from ?805m a year ago


Whilst online shopping increased last month by 30% according to the Interactive Media in Retail Group (IMRG).
Computing World posted

The increase is the biggest in the last seven months, tripling from 13.4 per cent in February to 29.3 per cent in April 2005.
The same research shows that, although overall sales across all retail channels were fairly flat – down 0.1 per cent compared to April 2004 rates – online growth came at the expense of the high street, which fell 4.2 per cent and was down from a slight 2.9 per cent rise this February.


Computing world however has some interesting analysis, that, faced with decreasing sales on the high street, retailers still see an online/mobile digital strategy too risky. Quoting Nick Gladding, senior analyst at retail researcher Verdict

'A retailer facing intense competition on the high street in unlikely to invest online,' he said. 'They still see it as too risky.'
There is also a fear that investing more in an online presence will only cannibalise existing high-street sales at the expense of overall sales growth, Andrew McCelland, IMRG development director told Computing.
'But there's more risk losing sales to the competition who do have e-retail strategies,' added McClelland. 'This is particularly the case when you realise it is time-poor, cash-rich consumers that are more like to shop online.


I find it fascinating that companies have not got to grips with our digital universe. An AOL report of 2003 showed that people do in fact change their behaviour when they can shop online. From doing it in your pyjamas to simply wishing to avoid the heaving crowds.
For heavens sake – what would you want to do? Get in your car, fight your way to whichever high street retailer it is – that all look the same – bland – to get poor service, the item is not in stock – have an adversarial experience – whilst the kids are screaming etc., Or do you go online have a quick shop – purchase an item or two and then go and; play golf, watch the football, go to your dance class, do the gardening, spend an extra hour in bed, play with the kids in the park.
As someone once said I hate shopping but I love to shop on ebay. Now why is that? Ultimately, I am not saying that there will be no high street left, but perhaps our notions of how we spend our time are changing – slowly. And this affects traditional retailing concepts Gary Hamel writes

Thousands of look-alike products are launched each year, distinguished only by their advertising. From the 1950's to the 1990's, consumer marketing was innovations high ground. The best and brightest no longer wanted to be scientists, they wanted to be brand managers. The new industrial order is the product of a very different type of innovation?one built on neither the slow accretion of scientific knowledge nor the breathless hype of Madison avenue, but instead on leaps of human imagination.
The goal is no longer a patent or a new ad campaign, but a radical concepts, and ideas.

The Birth of the mobile information society

May 28th, 2005

Never read The City in Your Pocket by Timo Kopomaa?

Then you should if you want to understand mobile:

THE FREEDOM PROVIDED by the mobile phone means that people are always available, even when moving, i.e. they are maximizing their contact potential. The more people have a mobile phone, the more complete this reachability becomes. The “need” behind the use of the mobile phones is not just a need for contacts but for autonomous life management, a need to expand the scope of this management both geographically and temporarily. The mobile phone is used to increase the potential in life and to decrease the feeling of possibly missing something.

Channel hoppers

May 26th, 2005

Apparently people flick and channel hop 8,000 times per week according to Nelisen and OMD.
DeSocio a media strategist at OMD says in an interview with mediapost

They know how to navigate, he said, noting that there are now only 18 TV shows with an average Nielsen rating of 5.0 or higher. "How many deliver less than a 1.0 rating?" DeSocio queried the CAB crows. His answer: 1,723.


The whole post is worth a read – OMD have even set up a unit called "Emerging Technologies" to handle our new digital world.

Yahoo and the 4C’s

May 26th, 2005

Yahoo! Offers Tailored Movie Recommendations

YAHOO! IS EXPECTED TO ANNOUNCE today the addition of individualized movie recommendations to Yahoo! Movies, with the help of personalization platform provider ChoiceStream. The service is intended to bolster Yahoo! Movies as a pre-viewing must-read, by providing users with a tailored picture of the movie market.


Via Mediapost

Yahoo is getting back to the 4C's Connectivity, Culture (content), Community (an interested audience), Commerce (business)

Trust: the most precious commodity any brand or business has

May 26th, 2005

From the New York Times

Believe It: The Media’s Credibility Headache Gets Worse

The Times says

Almost like clockwork, each new month seems to usher in a new controversy over journalistic competence or integrity – the latest being the retracted May 9 article in Newsweek, about a report that American interrogators flushed a Koran down the toilet, that has been linked by the White House to at least 17 deaths during anti-American protests that followed.

These events come at a time when American confidence in the news media is at an all-time low. Most other major institutions in public life – while dealing with their own credibility issues – are more trusted.

FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein quoted in a recent speech at the Media Institute in Washington, DC. Citing the rising tide of product placement, branded entertainment and even video news releases that pose as genuine newscasts, Adelstein concluded

It is a cardinal right of every American to assume that radio and TV programs that appear to be based on authentic editorial judgments of the stations are in fact just that, unless the public is told otherwise. After all, the most fundamental responsibility of broadcast stations is to serve the public interest, and broadcasters are accountable to their communities. We have a right to know that people who present themselves to be independent, unbiased experts and reporters are not shills hired to promote a corporate – or governmental – agenda.

I want my MP3 (4) and I want it NOW

May 26th, 2005

Online Media Daily today posts Study: Gens X, Y Want Music Via Cell Phone

MOBILE PHONE SERVICE PROVIDERS WOULD be wise to offer users the ability to receive video and audio files, according to a study scheduled to be released today by The Management Network Group , a management, marketing, and technology consultancy.
The study, based on a March online survey of 13- to-34-year-olds, found that more than 37 percent of mobile phone users are interested in receiving broadband multimedia content. For young men ages 13-24, that rate increases to 40 percent.

In addition, almost one of four respondents age 18 and older said they might switch to another carrier if their current service provider doesn’t offer mobile media services.

Interestingly the report concludes

What’s more, consumers favor free, ad-supported content over subscription-supported, ad-free content. Roughly two out of five consumers would be interested in receiving ad-supported multimedia, compared to one out of five who would be willing to pay subscription fees for ad-free content.

I am not so sure about the last point, but that may be my own personal preference. Perhaps the world will divide into those that are happy to get it free with advertisments an those that would prefer an ad free world. That’s OK when you are reaching the demographic you want. what happens when you can’t reach them through interruptive marketing?

Product placement regulation – deregulation

May 26th, 2005

In the FT today 26 May 2005 – OfCom announces the relaxation of its draconian regulation on commercial sponsorship of television.
SMLXL has charted the duress that commercial broadcasters are under as they cannot sustain profitability and growth from traditional revenue streams.
The FT says:

The relaxation reflects concerns over the future of advertising-dependent TV. According to industry figures, the audience share for ITV1 fell 7% in the first four months of the year, reflecting the intensity of the competition


The FT notes on the changing of the rules

Under the new rules, sponsorship will be allowed as long as it is clearly labelled, remains seperate from the programme and does not affect editorial independence.


So that's good then – however, from the other side of the Atlantic comes the chilly wind of what happens when commercialisation becomes increasingly pervasive in broadcast media.
AdAge reports

A member of the Federal Communications Commission, Jonathan S. Adelstein, today warned about the "increasing commercialization of American media" and called on his agency to toughen its requirements and expand its investigations into the practice of product placement.
FCC commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein called for stricter product placement disclosure rules.
"People out there are frustrated by what they see as fake news and relentless marketing," Mr. Adelstein told the Media Institute, a nonprofit agency specializing in communications policy and the First Amendment. "The use of covert commercial pitches is penetrating deeper and deeper into our media."


The dna of American Broadcasting is very different to to the UK – where the US broadcast model was created out of a desire to market to a nation rather than a Public Service Broadcast model which is the UK's heritage.
One only has to look to the reaction to Heniz sponsoring of Dinner Doctors that resulted in an ITC investigation – though all parties were exonerated – as to how we as a nation feel about what are perceived to be covert commercial agendas – or any agenda that is in fact not transparent.
The Iraq war springs to mind.
I think OfCom has made the right move, I believe many will be nervous. Commercial television is under threat by the fragmentation of audiences, the wholesale unbundling of media and the changing consumption habits of much needed audiences. The migration of TV budgets for spot advertising to other channels means that something has to be done.
The questioin is can the advertisers be able to utilse this opportunity intellegently so as not to end up in the same position as the US? If we feel as viewers that we are watching product placement vs. great drama, you know what we are going to do with the remote control.
Brands need to realise that to take full advantage for themselves, they, have to create 'branded entertianment', that delivers both for them and their audiences. The challenge is to make it better not worse.
Additional reading: Boundaries on sex relaxed The Guardian

Big business putting the squeeze on Newspapers

May 26th, 2005

Shame on BP. And shame on Morgan Stanley and General Motors and any other advertisers involved in assaults on editorial integrity and independence. By wielding their ad budgets as weapons to beat down newsrooms, these companies threaten the bond that media properties have with their audiences, the very thing that gives media their value to advertisers to begin with.

was the opening salvo from AdAge Editorial

It seems strange in a world where communication flows at lightning speed, that brands like Kryptonite can be destroyed by a community pissed off that they were sold a lie rather than a promise, where Verizon where taken to court in a civil class action – that blue chip brands are looking to ascert themselves in such a fashion.

Because the truth always comes and bites you in the arse – eventually.

What does it mean to us as individuals and as communities, if, what we read in the press becomes under even greater scrutiny, because we wonder if on that day BP or whoever else is running a big editorial and advertising campaign consectuively – that there is spin in the journalism due to pressure from the brand.

Adage says

Trust and credibility
The primary reasons for advertisers to invest in any media product should be the bond that product has with its audience and the relevance of that audience as a marketing target. Such relationships are often based on trust and credibility. Tools such as ad-pull policies can damage that credibility. They make clear to editors and publishers that if they don’t create an editorial environment friendly to a marketer’s message, the money will go elsewhere.

I couldn’t agree more. Credibility beats authority any day of the week.

Follow SMLXL