August 26th, 2010
In No Straight Lines I talk about the systemic breakdown of models of control and organisation that were defined by an industrial era. Jay Rosen tweeted this article which is a fascinating insight into the Japanese media world, that was a closed shop and known as the Kisha Club. What my friend Richard Ross would describe as the architecture of authority.
Its well worth the read, bits that caught my eye,
Ginko Kobayashi, a London-based Japanese journalist who is author of the popular Japanese-language UK Media Watch blog says: “There’s been a battle going on in recent years between the traditional Japanese media, whose policies are decided by middle-aged men, and the Net media, dominated by people in their 20s and 30s. Net media—Ustream, Twitter and famous blogs—are changing the direction of debates in Japan, though not in a major way yet.”
Obviously members of the British Press and and Rupert Murdoch are also Japanese by the sounds of things, Rupes would love this sort of control…
Commenting on how new media technologies have impacted traditional mainstream Japanese media, Uesugi singled out Twitter, whose adoption by freelancers means that “(government) press conferences are effectively held online. As a result, at least the public has learned about the existence of the dreadful system known as the kisha club. The Internet has had a positive effect. I think the kisha club system will collapse within the next 10 years.”
(Here a link) to my thoughts on where I think newsbrands are heading and why.
Three moral hazards bedevil Japan’s mainstream media, Jimbo says: cross-ownership, under which the “Big Five” media groups—Yomiuri, Asahi, Mainichi, Nihon Keizai and Sankei—own or have stakes in dozens of TV stations, radio stations, newspapers and magazines; the kisha club system; and the resale price maintenance system, which allows newspaper companies to sell their products at prices higher than the market would normally dictate.
Such cozy arrangements ill serve the Japanese public, Jimbo believes. “In the past 50 years, there’s been no newcomer in the Japanese mass media industry. Back in the ’70s cable TV came along, satellite TV arrived in the ’90s, and now there’s the Internet, which is finally changing the shape of the media, slowly,” he says. “But in the past 50 years, the five conglomerates have dominated the market, and there’s been no newcomer. That shows how closed the market is, and how well protected they are.”
It all comes down to that millennial struggle of “power”, who has it and who wields it. It major organisations control the sphere of public debate about important topics they control society politically. As Franz Fanon said, “a people will only be free when they control their own communications”. As Karel van Wolferen, emeritus professor of comparative political and economic institutions at the University of Amsterdam describes the Japanese media, a “well-tuned single-voice choir”. Van Wolferen also observed,
“Since the large newspapers in Japan are really major authors of political reality—much more so than newspapers in any European country or the United States—because of the arrangements that they have with each other: the agreements about what to highlight, what to write about and what to cover up, that means that Japanese newspapers are going to be less important in determining political reality in Japan.”
These are the challenges of living in a networked society, that affect every society on this planet.